Elsevier

Annals of Epidemiology

Volume 15, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 98-104
Annals of Epidemiology

Attrition in a population-based cohort eight years after baseline interview: The Cornella Health Interview Survey Follow-up (CHIS.FU) Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.06.002Get rights and content

Purpose

To examine how response at follow-up varied from baseline sociodemographic data in a Spanish population-based cohort after 8 years of follow-up.

Methods

The Cornella Health Interview Survey Follow-up (CHIS.FU) Study is a population-based cohort study on lifestyle risk factors and their consequences on health status with 2500 participants at baseline. We have compared the distribution of baseline characteristics according to the results at follow-up (interview, decease, migration, or refusal).

Results

Almost two-thirds of the subjects who did not respond to the follow-up interview had died or moved to another town. Sex was a determinant of attrition in deceased and non-traced participants. Refusal appeared to be associated with working status and place of birth. Self-perceived health was one of the characteristics associated with mortality; subjects who perceived their health as poor were 2.6 times more likely to die than those who felt they were in good health. Disabled and retired subjects together with housewives showed a higher risk of dying than individuals still working. The determinants of attrition among emigrated subjects were civil status, age, level of studies, working status, and birth place.

Conclusion

Although the attrition was non-random, there was no serious bias in estimates of change and in determinants of change due to attrition.

Introduction

The validity of longitudinal survey data can be threatened by several factors, including the dimensions of attrition: the response rate, the specific reasons for non-response, and the characteristics of non-respondents 1., 2.. The loss of subjects to follow-up can be a significant menace to the internal and external validity of longitudinal studies, when those lost differ from those found in the outcomes themselves or in the factors affecting outcomes 3., 4.. The study design depends upon the availability of subjects for repeated interviews. That is, the success of any longitudinal survey depends upon its subjects remaining in the study (5). If participants at the follow-up are not representative of all subjects from the baseline interview, intragroup changes cannot be generalized to the initial population.

Two categories of causes of attrition have been defined: causes that cannot be influenced by the researchers, including the characteristics of subjects; and causes that are modifiable by the researchers (6), such as research efforts and aspects of the study design. Of course, preventing loss to follow-up is the most desirable approach and is the only way to assure that selection bias will not occur (7). However, no matter how careful researchers are, there will always be such losses 8., 9., 10.. If the original sample was representative of a specific population, then survey analysis may provide misleading conclusions about changes in population characteristics over time if these individuals leave the sample in a non-random way (11).

Information on the type of attrition and on the possible determinants of attrition is important for a proper interpretation of the results of cohort studies (12). The most prominent types of attrition include those subjects who refuse further participation, those who cannot be located at follow-up, and those who have died during the follow-up period (13).

The best way to estimate non-response bias and its potential effect in epidemiological research is to know the characteristics of non-respondents (14). The comparison of the information available from the baseline allows an assessment of whether respondents differ from non-respondents (15). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine how response at follow-up varied from baseline sociodemographic data in a Spanish population-based cohort after 8 years of follow-up.

Section snippets

Methods

The Cornella Health Interview Survey Follow-up (CHIS.FU) Study is a population-based cohort study on lifestyles and their consequences on health. The cohort was set up with 2500 subjects (1263 women and 1237 men) randomly selected from the general population and interviewed in person in 1994 within the Cornella Health Interview Study (CHIS) 16., 17.. Cornella de Llobregat (http://www.cornellaweb.com) is a city with 85,000 inhabitants in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona, Spain. We attempted to

Results

Table 1 shows the distribution of the study participants according to baseline variables and the result of the follow-up interview: subjects who responded to the general questionnaire, those who refused the interview, those found dead in the record linkage or after phone tracking, those found emigrated, and those finally non-traced. Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 show the logistic regression analysis for each of these outcomes.

The variables associated with refusal in the bivariate analysis

Discussion

To detect a possible selection bias in follow-up we analyzed whether respondents differed from non-respondents. We have observed that the attrition was non-random, i.e., some characteristics were associated with specific causes of loss in the follow-up interview. Previous studies have reported response rates to telephone interviews and the presence of non-response bias related to lifestyle risk factors 20., 21., but few data have been published about health status differences among responders

References (35)

  • S. Greenland

    Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1977)
  • D.J.H. Deeg et al.

    Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: The effect of differential inclusion in side studies

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • J.R. Hunt et al.

    Retaining and tracking cohort study members

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1998)
  • J. Stevenson

    Problems in designing and carrying out longitudinal research

    Nord J Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • W.B. Hansen et al.

    Attrition in prevention research

    J Behav Med

    (1985)
  • R. De Graaf et al.

    Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • J. Barton et al.

    Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire

    Am J Public Health

    (1980)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Risk of attrition in a longitudinal study of skin cancer: Logistic and survival models can give different results

      2013, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of all age/attrition associations, age was only found to be predictive of nondeath attrition when participants were aged between 40 and 59 years at baseline (model 2). Consequently, these results do not constitute support of the existing literature, which has consistently reported age to be predictive of study attrition [11,14,28,53]. The only association resilient to variation in analytical approach was between smoking status at baseline and attrition.

    • Does attrition bias longitudinal population-based studies on back pain?

      2011, European Journal of Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      Possibly passive refusal due to lack of interest contributed to this observation as we targeted a general population cohort. This is suggested by other surveys that identified socio-demographic variables as important predictors of attrition due to refusal (Psaty et al., 1994; de Graaf et al., 2000; Zunzunegui et al., 2001; Garcia et al., 2005). Interestingly, age effects were even enhanced after controlling for response behaviour.

    • Absent risk of dysglycemia after bacterial gastroenteritis

      2010, Canadian Journal of Diabetes
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, a supplementary analysis of dysglycemia rates at the end of 2003 in those completing FPG tests during that year were concordant with the primary analysis, suggesting that differential attrition and ascertainment during the last year of follow-up were unlikely to be main influences in this study. It is also encouraging that other large studies have empirically observed that the impact of attrition on measures of association between exposures and outcomes is negligible (36–38). A third limitation relates to our definition of gastroenteritis.

    • Characteristics of nonparticipants differed based on reason for nonparticipation: a study involving the chronically ill

      2008, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Little is known about the characteristics of nonparticipants according to their type of nonparticipation. Several reasons for nonparticipation have been identified in the literature: refusal at initial contact, being untraceable, death, and refusal at follow-up [8–11]. Few studies involving the chronically ill describe characteristics of nonparticipants by type of nonparticipation [4–6,8,11]; and of those that do, there is insufficient consistency in classification of type of nonparticipation to draw conclusions about characteristics across studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study is partially funded by Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI02/0261) and the Cornella de Llobregat City Council. M. Garcia received financial support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Network for Research in Epidemiology and Public Health, RCESP, C03/09).

    The CHIS.FU Study Group: Esteve Fernandez (principal investigator), Anna Schiaffino and Montse Garcia (study coordinators), and Mercè Martí, Esteve Saltó, Gloria Pérez, Mercè Peris, Carme Borrell, F. Javier Nieto, and Josep Maria Borràs (associate researchers).

    View full text