Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 15, Issue 8 , Page 649, September 2005

Practices for early detection of breast camcer among Muslim women in Southern California

Charles Drew University of Medicine & Science; University of California, Los Angeles

P53

Purpose

Breast cancer (BC) is a serious women's health problem. Its early detection necessitates women to practice breast self-examination (BSE), have clinical breast examination (CBE) and mammogram. Our study aims at exploring BC detection practices of Muslim women in Southern California.

Methods

We collected data from a convenience sample of 226 Muslim women ≥30 years old using a questionnaire in the primary language of the subjects. Among the 226 women, 82% were ≥40 years old, 78% were married, and 20% had family history of BC. The racial/ethnic distribution was 30% Asian, 27% South Asian, 17% Arab, 9% Iranian, 9% African American, and 7% White. One third of the women never practiced BSE and one third had not undergone CBE during the past two years. Among women ≥40 years old, 46% did not have mammogram in the past two years. The data showed that practices for early detection of BC varied by race/ethnicity. Iranians (47%) and Arabs (54%) had the lowest percentage of BSE relative to other groups (p < 0.05). CBE was lower among Iranians (47%) and South Asians (58%) relative to other groups (p < 0.05). Among women ≥40 years old, Iranian (47%), African American (50%) and Arab (54%) reported the lowest prevalence of mammography relative to other groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

A significant number of Muslim women in California did not engage in early BC detection practices. Utilization of mammography among women ≥40 years old in our study (54%) was lower than both the national level (70%) and the level for California (75.5%). This difference could be due to differences in culture and/or religion. Further studies are needed to investigate the factors associated with the low utilization of practices for early detection of breast cancer among Muslim women population in California.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1047-2797(05)00196-1

doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.008

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 15, Issue 8 , Page 649, September 2005