Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 15, Issue 8 , Pages 649-650, September 2005

Are diabetes patients at highest risk for developing complications getting screened?

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Epidemiology, Pittsburgh, PA

P55

Purpose

Poor glycemic control, hypertension and poor lipid control are associated with the development of all the major diabetes complications. Patients with these risk factors are therefore at higher risk for developing complications than those without these risk factors, and it especially important that these individuals get proper screening for complications. We analyzed 404 subjects from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study type 1 diabetes cohort to examine whether or not patients at highest risk for developing complications are getting screened.

Methods

Clinical exam data for subjects collected in 1992 was used to determine risk, and consisted of blood pressure reading, HbA1c, and total cholesterol level. Blood pressure readings above 130/80mmHg, HbA1c values above 9.5% and total cholesterol levels above 200 mg/dL were considered high risk values. Patients with 2 or more high risk values were classified as being at high risk. Data on screening tests, complications, and health status were collected via self-report surveys in 2000. Screening tests assessed included dilated eye exam, fasting lipid test, foot exam, urine protein test. Self-reported complications included the presence of diabetic eye disease requiring laser therapy, myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes-related renal failure, or amputation. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between high risk and receipt of screening test. Models were adjusted for disease duration and diabetes complications.

Results

In unadjusted analysis, high risk was associated with receipt of fasting lipid test (OR=1.785, p=.038); foot examination (OR=1.956, p=.012), urine test for protein (OR=1.998, p=.017), and receipt of all screening tests (OR=2.07, p=.005). In adjusted analysis, high risk remained a significant predictor of urine test for protein (OR=2.0, p=.022), foot exam (OR=2.0, p=.01), and receipt of all screening tests (OR=1.9, p=.015).

Conclusion

It appears as though individuals at high risk are more likely to get recommended screening tests.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1047-2797(05)00198-5

doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.010

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 15, Issue 8 , Pages 649-650, September 2005