Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 227-236 , March 2007

Test for Additive Interaction in Proportional Hazards Models

  • Rongling Li, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Rongling Li, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66 N. Pauline Street, Suite 633, Memphis, TN 38163. Tel.: 901-448-5900; fax: 901-448-7041.
  • ,
  • Lloyd Chambless, PhD

Received 6 July 2006 ,Accepted 20 October 2006.

References 

  1. Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Concepts of Interaction. In:  Rothman KJ,  Greenland S editor. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998;p. 329–341
  2. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston, Toronto: Little, Brown and Company; 1986;320
  3. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology. 1992;3:452–456
  4. Skrondal A. Interaction as departure from additivity in case-control studies: a cautionary note. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:251–258
  5. Investigators TA. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:687–702
  6. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London, New York: Chapman and Hall; 1984;
  7. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, P.W H. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1975:486-502.
  8. Li R, Boerwinkle E, Olshan AF, et al. Glutathione S-transferase genotype as a susceptibility factor in smoking-related coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis. 2000;149:451–462
  9. Barlow WE. Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics. 1994;50:1064–1072
  10. Hozawa A, Folsom AR, Sharrett AR, Payne TJ, Chambless LE. Does the impact of smoking on coronary heart disease differ by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level?: the Artherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC). Study. Circ J. 2006;70:1105–1110
  11. Smith PG, Day NE. The design of case-control studies: the influence of confounding and interaction effects. Int J Epidemiol. 1984;13:356–365

PII: S1047-2797(06)00264-X

doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.009

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 227-236 , March 2007