Are Frequent Asthma Symptoms Among Low-Income Individuals Related to Heavy Traffic Near Homes, Vulnerabilities, or Both?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.01.006Get rights and content

Purpose

To investigate whether frequent asthma symptoms (daily/weekly symptoms) can be attributed to traffic-related exposures, poverty, and/or vulnerabilities.

Methods

Annual average daily vehicle traffic density (TD) within 500 feet of 2001 California Health Interview Survey respondents' residential cross streets was calculated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between annual average TD and frequent asthma symptoms with income as a confounder and a modifier.

Results

After adjustment for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, a 92% increase in frequent asthma symptoms was observed among those in high TD and a 50% increase among those in medium TD compared to those in low TD. Adjustment for poverty did not change these estimates, but individuals in poverty were twice more likely to experience frequent symptoms. Furthermore, delays in care, a poor/fair health status, current/previous smoking, overweight/obese, or unemployment showed independent associations with frequent asthma symptoms. Analyses stratified on income indicated greater estimated traffic effects for asthmatics in poverty, whereas the estimates for asthmatics above the poverty level moved closer toward the null.

Conclusions

Traffic-related exposures, poverty and vulnerabilities all increased the risk of frequent asthma symptoms. Those in poverty appeared to be more strongly affected by heavy traffic near their residences.

Introduction

Asthma is one of the most common chronic health conditions in the United States. In 2005, 32.6 million Americans (11.2% of the population) were diagnosed with asthma (1). Asthma symptoms can be controlled effectively with clinical treatment and avoidance of environmental triggers. In the past two decades, major advances in the development of anti-inflammatory medications for asthma were made. However, many Americans are still suffering from daily/weekly symptoms, which we define herein as frequent asthma symptoms. In California, more than 620,000 adults (nearly one in every four with asthma) and 124,000 children (one in every ten with asthma) experienced frequent asthma symptoms in 2001 (2). People of low income disproportionately suffer from frequent asthma symptoms. Among Californian adults with asthma, those in poverty (with a family income below the federal poverty level [FPL]) were almost twice as likely to experience frequent asthma symptoms as those with incomes at or above three times the FPL (34.2% and 18.6%, respectively) (2). The extra burden of asthma among populations with low socioeconomic status has also been documented in other studies 3, 4, 5, 6.

In developed countries, traffic exhaust is one of the most important sources of outdoor air pollution. Truck, car, bus, and other vehicle emissions produce a complex mixture of toxic chemicals (e.g. benzene, particulate matter) and a variety of irritant gases, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide and ozone (O3) (7). In California, the increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on California roadways (97%) outpaced population growth (40%) between 1982 and 2001 (8). Previous studies reported associations between proximity to heavy traffic and frequent asthma symptoms 9, 10, 11. It has also been reported that environmental risks are inversely correlated with income (12). For example, Californian block groups in the lowest quartile of median family income were three times more likely to be high-traffic areas than were block groups in the highest income quartile (13). A study also showed that minority and high-poverty neighborhoods bore over two times the levels of traffic density compared with the rest of the Southern California region (14). High prevalence of severe asthma among low-income groups may also reflect differences in access to care, such as lack of insurance, and presence of other risk factors, such as smoking, second-hand smoking, or obesity 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.

However, there is limited information regarding whether the higher prevalence of frequent asthma symptoms among low-income individuals is related to higher exposure to air pollutants, greater vulnerability because of poverty, and associated factors such as compromised health status, poor access to care, and behavioral risk factors, or to a combination of these factors 21, 22. As the largest state-level survey in the nation, the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) provides a unique opportunity to examine the interactions among these factors. Using data from Los Angeles and San Diego County respondents of CHIS 2001 and traffic count data from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), we addressed the following questions: (1) Do people in poverty have higher exposures to vehicle-related air pollution (as measured by traffic density near homes) and/or greater vulnerabilities (as measured by overall health status, being obese or overweight, smoking status, insurance status, delays in care, and employment status)? (2) Is the higher prevalence of frequent asthma symptoms among those in poverty related to greater traffic exposures, vulnerabilities, or both? (3) Are individuals in poverty likely to suffer greater health effects from traffic exposures due to a combination of greater exposure and greater vulnerability?

Section snippets

Methods

Eligible study participants were respondents from whom health data were collected between November 2000 and September 2001 as part of CHIS 2001, who (1) resided in Los Angeles or San Diego Counties during this period and (2) reported ever having been diagnosed with asthma by a physician. CHIS is a two-stage, geographically stratified random-digit-dial (RDD) telephone survey that has been conducted biannually in California since 2001. CHIS 2001 included adults, adolescents, and children from

Results

Table 1 lists the distribution of CHIS respondents with asthma by sociodemographic characteristics, traffic exposures, and vulnerabilities. The prevalence of frequent asthma symptoms was 26.0% among those in poverty versus 15.9% among those above the FPL. Asthmatic respondents below the FPL were more likely to be children and adolescents (ages 1–17), women, and Latino; they were also more likely to live near heavy traffic, to be unemployed, uninsured, and in overall fair or poor health.

Discussion

Our results suggest that the higher prevalence of frequent asthma symptoms among low-income individuals is related to both higher traffic exposures and increased susceptibility to environmental challenges by virtue of differences in underlying health status and access to medical care. Furthermore, those in poverty appeared to be more affected by heavy traffic near homes than those above the poverty level, although the strength of this conclusion is limited by a lack of statistical power to

References (54)

  • C. Monn et al.

    Small-scale spatial variability of particulate matter <10 μm (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide

    Atmospheric Environ

    (1997)
  • Y.Y. Meng et al.

    Emergency department visits for asthma: the role of frequent symptoms and delay in care

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2006)
  • S.B. Sarpong et al.

    Socioeconomic status and race as risk factors for cockroach allergen exposure and sensitization in children with asthma

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (1996)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality, 2003-2005. Vol. 2007;...
  • Y.Y. Meng et al.

    Asthma in California: findings from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey

    (2003)
  • D.C. Goodman et al.

    Trends in pediatric asthma hospitalization rates: regional and socioeconomic differences

    Pediatrics

    (1998)
  • D.M. Mannino et al.

    Surveillance for asthma—United States, 1960–1995

    MMWR CDC Surveill Summ

    (1998)
  • M. Castro et al.

    Risk factors for asthma morbidity and mortality in a large metropolitan city

    J Asthma

    (2001)
  • CARB

    The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality

  • H. Duhme et al.

    The association between self-reported symptoms of asthma and allergic rhinitis and self-reported traffic density on street of residence in adolescents

    Epidemiology

    (1996)
  • M. Studnicka et al.

    Traffic-related NO2 and the prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms in seven year olds

    Eur Respir J

    (1997)
  • G.W. Evans et al.

    Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (2002)
  • R.B. Gunier et al.

    Traffic density in California: socioeconomic and ethnic differences among potentially exposed children

    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol

    (2003)
  • D. Houston et al.

    Structural disparities of urban traffic in Southern California: implications for vehicle related air pollution exposure in minority and high-poverty neighborhoods

    J Urban Affairs

    (2004)
  • P.F. Belamarich et al.

    Do obese inner-city children with asthma have more symptoms than nonobese children with asthma?

    Pediatrics

    (2000)
  • N. Halfon et al.

    Childhood asthma and poverty: differential impacts and utilization of health services

    Pediatrics

    (1993)
  • M.S. O'Neill et al.

    Health, wealth, and air pollution: advancing theory and methods

    Environ Health Perspect

    (2003)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Proximity to busy highways and local resident perceptions of air quality

      2015, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      The behaviour of fresh vehicle emissions (composition, chemical transformation and interaction with meteorology) is relatively well-understood and the understandings of the effects on human health are steadily progressing. Numerous case studies have investigated associations between residence near high-volume roads and human health impacts, including impacts amongst vulnerable groups, such as children attending schools and vulnerable persons in low-income communities (Carrier et al., 2014a,b; Kim et al., 2004; Meng et al., 2008; Molitor et al., 2011). For some large cities, communities with close residential proximity to major highways are among the poorest which has given rise to exposure inequity research, commonly known as Environmental Justice (EJ).

    • Environmental risk factors for asthma in Lucknow: A case-control study

      2013, Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subbarao et al, reviewed epidemiology, etiology and risk factors for disease asthma and found many other factors like maternal smoking, diet and nutrition, stress, use of antibiotics, delivery by cesarean section, allergic sensitization, environmental tobacco smoke, exposure to animals, breastfeeding, decreased lung function in infancy, family size and structure, socio-economic status, antibiotics and infections, and sex to be associated with disease asthma.6 Literature suggests major risk factors for asthma such as; tobacco smoke, active and passive smoking, air pollution (including dust, pollution, smoke emitting industries, traffic pollution that is also linked to severe asthma attacks).7–29 A study by Gupta and Bala in the year 2011 concluded, Indian output on asthma is quite low in the global context as reflected from its publications output per thousand populations and its world population share during 1999–2008.6

    • Associations between urban air pollution and pediatric asthma control in El Paso, Texas

      2013, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Associations were not significant for those having used government sponsored insurance during the previous year, although they were consistently more positive than results from children who did not use government insurance. These findings compare to previous studies that have found stronger associations between air pollutants and exacerbation of asthma among low SES subjects (Gold and Wright, 2005; Goodman et al., 1998; Meng et al., 2008; Neidell, 2004; Ray et al., 1998). In those who were not defined as having an allergic phenotype, associations were also negative with NO2, benzene, and toluene.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text