Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 121-124 , February 2009

Breast Cancer Survival in Ontario and California, 1998–2006: Socioeconomic Inequity Remains Much Greater in the United States

  • Kevin M. Gorey, PhD, MSW

      Affiliations

    • School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Ontario
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Kevin M. Gorey, Professor and Assumption University Research Chair in Canadian and American Population Health, School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada. Tel.: 519-253-3000, ext. 3085; fax: 519 973-7036.
    • ,
  • Isaac N. Luginaah, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London
    • ,
  • Eric J. Holowaty, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto
    • ,
  • Karen Y. Fung, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Windsor, Ontario
    • ,
  • Caroline Hamm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Windsor Regional Cancer Center, Ontario

Received 5 September 2008 ,Accepted 21 October 2008.

References 

  1. Gorey KM, Holowary EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Moskowitz A, Webster DJ, et al. An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1156–1163
  2. Gorey KM, Kliewer E, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Ng EY. An international comparison of breast cancer survival: Winnipeg, Manitoba and Des Moines, Iowa, metropolitan areas. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13:32–41
  3. Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Richter NL, Meyer CM. An international comparison of cancer survival: metropolitan Toronto, Ontario and Honolulu, Hawaii. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1866–1872
  4. Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Richter NL, Meyer CM. An international comparison of cancer survival: relatively poor areas of Toronto, Ontario and three US metropolitan areas. J Public Health Med. 2000;22:343–348
  5. Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Holowaty EJ, Fung KY, Hamm C. Wait times for initial surgical and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in Canada and the United States: evidence of greater socioeconomic inequity in America. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;In press
  6. Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Holowaty EJ, Fung KY, Hamm C, Balagurusamy M, et al Increased racial differences on breast cancer and survival in America: historical evidence consistent with a health insurance hypothesis, 1975–2001. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;In press
  7. Gorey KM, Fung KY, Luginaah IN, Bartfay E, Hamm C, Wright FC, et al. Cancer survival in Ontario, 1986–2003: evidence of equitable advances across most diverse urban and rural places. Can J Public Health. 2008;99:12–16
  8. Coburn N, Fulton J, Pearlman DN, Law C, DiPaolo B, Cady B. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2008;14:128–134
  9. Bickell NA, LePar F, Wang JJ, Leventhal H. Lost opportunities: physicians’ reasons and disparities in breast cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2516–2521
  10. Foley KL, Kimmick G, Camacho F, Levine EA, Balkrishnan R, Anderson R. Survival disadvantage among Medicaid-insured breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery without radiation therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:207–214
  11. Griggs JJ, Culakova E, Sorbero ME, Poniewierski MS, Wolff DA, Crawford J, et al. Social and racial differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2522–2527
  12. Richardson LC, Tian L, Voti L, Hartzema AG, Reis I, Fleming LE, et al. The roles of teaching hospitals, insurance status, and race/ethnicity in receipt of adjuvant therapy for regional-stage breast cancer in Florida. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:160–166
  13. McDavid K, Tucker TC, Sloggett A, Coleman MP. Cancer survival in Kentucky and health insurance coverage. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2135–2144
  14. Hall S, Schulze K, Groome P, Mackillop W, Holowaty E. Using cancer registry data for survival studies: the example of the Ontario Cancer Registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:67–76
  15. Walter SD, Birnie SE, Marrett LD, Taylor SM, Reynolds D, Davies J, et al. The geographic variation of cancer incidence in Ontario. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:367–376
  16. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Data quality assessments. Available at: http://www.naaccr.org. Accessed on July 12, 2008.
  17. Wright WE. California Cancer Registry enhancement for breast cancer research. Berkeley (CA): California Public Health Foundation; 1996;
  18. Statistics Canada. Profiles of census tracts, 2001 (Ontario). Ottawa, 2002.
  19. Statistics Canada. Profiles of census subdivisions, 2001 (Ontario). Ottawa, 2002.
  20. United States Bureau of the Census. 2000 census of population and housing in California: summary tape file 3 on CD-ROM. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce; 2002;
  21. Shugarman LR, Sorbero MES, Tian H, Jain AK, Ashwood JS. An exploration of urban and rural differences in lung cancer survival among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1280–1287
  22. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. Rural-urban commuting area codes: Version 1.11. Available at: http://www.depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca1/rucas/html. Accessed on July 15, 2008.
  23. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Toronto: Residence coding manual; 2003;
  24. Statistics Canada. Definitions of “rural.” Ottawa, 2002.
  25. Health Canada. Definitions of “rural” summary. Ottawa, 2002.
  26. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV. Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1655–1671
  27. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader M, Subramanian SV, Carson R. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471–482
  28. Jargowsky PA. Poverty and place: ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997;
  29. California Cancer Registry . Cancer reporting in California: abstracting and coding procedures for hospitals. California Cancer Reporting System Standards. Vol I, 7th ed.. Sacramento (CA): Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section; 2003;
  30. In:  Young JL,  Roffers SD,  Ries LAG,  Fritz AG,  Hurlbut AA editor. SEER summary staging manual–2000: codes and coding instructions. NIH pub. no. 01–4969. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2001;
  31. National Cancer Institute . SEER Extent of Disease—1988 Codes and Coding Instructions. 3rd ed. NIH pub. no. 98-1999. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 1998;
  32. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981;
  33. Miettinen OS. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;103:226–235
  34. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–748
  35. Brown BW, Brauner C, Minnotte MC. Noncancer deaths in white adult cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:979–987

PII: S1047-2797(08)00349-9

doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.010

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 121-124 , February 2009

Article Tools