Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 19, Issue 7 , Pages 504-511, July 2009

The Male–Female Health–Survival Paradox: A Survey and Register Study of the Impact of Sex-Specific Selection and Information Bias

  • Anna Oksuzyan, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
    • Danish Aging Research Center, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Anna Oksuzyan, Address: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad-Zuse Str.1, 18057 Rostock, Germany. Tel.: +49 381 2082 178; fax: +49 381 2082 478.
  • ,
  • Inge Petersen, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Danish Aging Research Center, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
  • ,
  • Henrik Stovring, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
  • ,
  • Paul Bingley, MA, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The Danish National Center for Social Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • James W. Vaupel, MPP, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
  • ,
  • Kaare Christensen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Danish Aging Research Center, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
    • The Danish Twin Registry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense

Received 19 August 2008; accepted 2 March 2009. published online 20 May 2009.

Purpose

This study examined whether the health–survival paradox could be due partially to sex-specific selection and information bias in surveys.

Methods

The study is based on the linkage of three population-based surveys of 15,330 Danes aged 46–102 years with health registers covering the total Danish population regarding hospitalizations within the last 2 years and prescription medicine within 6 months before the baseline surveys.

Results

Men had higher participation rates than women at all ages. Hospitalized women and women taking medications had higher participation rate compared with nonhospitalized women (difference=0.7%–3.0%) and female nonusers (difference=0.8%–7.6%), respectively, whereas no consistent pattern was found among men according to hospitalization or medication use status. Men used fewer medications than women, but they underreported medication use to a similar degree as did women.

Conclusions

Hospitalized women, as well as women using prescription medicine, were slightly overrepresented in the surveys. Hence, the study found some evidence that selection bias in surveys may contribute to the explanation of the health–survival paradox, but its contribution is likely to be small. However, there was no evidence for sex-specific reporting of medication use among study participants.

Keywords: Sex Differences, Health, Mortality, Paradox, Nonresponse, Register Study, Healthcare Utilization, Hospitalization, Medication Use, Denmark

Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms: ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, ATC-C, cardiovascular system medications, ATC-M, musculoskeletal system medications, ATC-N, nervous system medications, ATC-R, respiratory system medications, c1905, Danish 1905-Cohort Study, CHD, coronary heart disease, CPR number, Civil Personal Registration Number, CVD, cardiovascular disease, ICD, International Classification of Diseases, LSADT, Longitudinal Study of Aging Danish Twins, MADT, Study of Middle-Aged Danish Twins

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1047-2797(09)00088-X

doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.014

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 19, Issue 7 , Pages 504-511, July 2009