Association of Paternal Age and Risk for Major Congenital Anomalies From the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2004
Purpose
The objective of this study was to examine the associations between paternal age and birth defects of unknown etiologies while carefully controlling for maternal age.
Methods
By using 1997 to 2004 data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, we fit logistic regression models with paternal and maternal age as continuous variables while adjusting for demographic and other factors.
Results
Elevated odds ratios (ORs) for each year increase in paternal age were found for cleft palate (OR. 1.02, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.00–1.04), diaphragmatic hernia (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.06), right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), and pulmonary valve stenosis (OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01–1.04). At younger paternal ages, each year increase in paternal age correlated with increased odds of having offspring with encephalocele, cataract, esophageal atresia, anomalous pulmonary venous return, and coarctation of the aorta, but these increased odds were not observed at older paternal ages. The effect of paternal age was modified by maternal age for gastroschisis, omphalocele, spina bifida, all orofacial clefts, and septal heart defects.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that paternal age may be a risk factor for some multifactorial birth defects.
Key Words: Congenital Abnormalities, Maternal Age, Paternal Age, Risk Factors
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms: ASD, atrial septal defect, VSD, ventricular septal defect, NBDPS, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, OEIS, Omphalocele, Exstrophy, Imperforate anus, Spinal defects, BMI, body mass index, OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval, RVOTO, right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, PVS, pulmonary valve stenosis, VATER/VACTERL, Vertebral, Anal, Cardiac, Tracheo-Esophageal, Renal, and Limb anomalies, APVR, anomalous pulmonary venous return
To access this article, please choose from the options below
A.F.O. was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES10126).
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
PII: S1047-2797(09)00367-6
doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.10.009
Published by Elsevier Inc.
