Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 20, Issue 10 , Pages 786-796 , October 2010

Computer-aided System of Evaluation for Population-based All-in-One Service Screening (CASE-PASS): From Study Design to Outcome Analysis with Bias Adjustment

  • Li-Sheng Chen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University
  • ,
  • Amy Ming-Fang Yen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Centre of Biostatistics Consultation, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University
  • ,
  • Stephen W. Duffy, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Cancer Research UK Centre, London
  • ,
  • Laszlo Tabar, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mammography, Falun Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden
  • ,
  • Wen-Chou Lin, MS

      Affiliations

    • Center for Disease Control, Department of Health, Taipei, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Hsiu-Hsi Chen, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Centre of Biostatistics Consultation, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Professor Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Division of Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Room 533, No. 17, Hsuchow Road, Taipei, Taiwan. Tel: +886-2-33228033. Fax: +886-2-23587707.

Received 6 January 2010 ,Accepted 23 June 2010.

References 

  1. Tábar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Chiang CF, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later: updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:625–651
  2. Nyström L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomized trials. Lancet. 1993;34:1973–1978
  3. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–1371
  4. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomized controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–1477
  5. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jørgensen OD, Søndergaard O. Randomized study as of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–1471
  6. Chang CM, Kuo HS, Chang SH, Chang HJ, Liou DM, Laszlo T, et al. Computer-aided disease prediction system: development of application software with SAS component language. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11:139–159
  7. Tábar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg LH, Gröntoft O, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985;325:829–832
  8. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen MF, Abdsalah S, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties: a collaborative evaluation. Cancer. 2002;95:458–469
  9. Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nyström L, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer. 2003;15(97):2387–2396
  10. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Landberg T, Lindholm K, Linell F, et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: The Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial. Br Med J. 1988;297:943–948
  11. Frisell J, Eklund G, Hellström L, Lidbrink E, Rutqvist LE, Somell A. Randomized study of mammography screening—preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm Trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991;18:49–56
  12. Labrie F, Candas B, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Bélanger A, Brousseau G, et al. Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Prostate. 2004;59:311–318
  13. Hakama M, Räsänen-Vintanen V. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;103:512–517
  14. Duffy SW, Cuzick J, Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen THH, Yen MF, et al. Correcting for non-compliance bias in case-control studies to evaluate cancer screening programmes. Appl Stat. 2002;51:235–243
  15. Cuzick J, Edwards R, Segnan N. Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997;16:1017–1029
  16. Chang CM, Lin WC, Kuo HS, Yen MF, Chen TH. Estimation and prediction system for multi-state disease process: application to analysis of organized screening regime. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:867–881
  17. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experiments: nonequivalent control group designs. In: Quasi-experimentation: design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co; 1979;p. 98–103
  18. The Swedish Organized Service Screening Evaluation Group. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:45–51
  19. The Swedish Organized Service Screening Evaluation Group. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 2. Validation with alternative analytic methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:52–56
  20. Habbema JD, van Oortmarssen GJ, Lubbe JT, van der Maas PJ. The MISCAN simulation program for the evaluation of screening for disease. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1985;20:79–93
  21. Duffy SW. Cancer screening in Asia. J Med Screen. 2006;13(Suppl 1):S1

PII: S1047-2797(10)00152-3

doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.003

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 20, Issue 10 , Pages 786-796 , October 2010