Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 20, Issue 10 , Pages 750-758 , October 2010

Incorporating Individual-Level Distributions of Exposure Error in Epidemiologic Analyses: An Example Using Arsenic in Drinking Water and Bladder Cancer

  • Jaymie R. Meliker, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Jaymie R. Meliker, PhD, Graduate Program in Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, HSC L3, Rm 071, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8338. Tel.: 631-444-1145.
    • ,
  • Pierre Goovaerts, PhD

      Affiliations

    • BioMedware, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI
    • ,
  • Geoffrey M. Jacquez, PhD

      Affiliations

    • BioMedware, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI
    • Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan
    • ,
  • Jerome O. Nriagu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan

Received 1 March 2010 ,Accepted 20 June 2010.

References 

  1. Hatch M, Thomas D. Measurement issues in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101(Suppl 4):49–57
  2. Prentice RL, Thomas D. Methodologic research needs in environmental epidemiology: data analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101(Suppl 4):39–48
  3. Rothman K. Methodological frontiers in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101(Suppl 4):19–21
  4. Dosemeci M, Wacholder S, Lubin JH. Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:746–748
  5. Flegal KM, Keyl PM, Nieto FJ. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:1233–1244
  6. Jurek AM, Greenland S, Maldonado G. How far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias results away from the null?. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:382–385
  7. Jurek AM, Greenland S, Maldonado G, Church TR. Proper interpretation of non-differential misclassification effects: expectations vs observations. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:680–687
  8. Wacholder S, Dosemeci M, Lubin JH. Blind assignment of exposure does not always prevent differential misclassification. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:433–437
  9. Thomas D, Stram D, Dwyer J. Exposure measurement error: influence on exposure-disease. Relationships and methods of correction. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:69–93
  10. Maldonado G. Adjusting a relative-risk estimate for study imperfections. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2008;62:655–663
  11. Barron BA. The effects of misclassification on the estimation of relative risk. Biometrics. 1977;33:414–417
  12. Chu H, Wang Z, Cole SR, Greenland S. Sensitivity analysis of misclassification: a graphical and a Bayesian approach. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16:834–841
  13. Fox MP, Lash TL, Greenland S. A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:1370–1376
  14. Gustafson P, Greenland S. Curious phenomena in Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification. Stat Med. 2006;25:87–103
  15. Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Wolk A, Greenland S. A tool for deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis of epidemiologic studies. Stata J. 2008;8:29–48
  16. Reade-Christopher J, Kupper LL. Effects of exposure misclassification on regression analyses of epidemiologic follow-up study data. Biometrics. 1991;47:535–548
  17. Weinkam JJ, Rosenbaum WL, Sterling TD. A practical approach to estimating the true effect of exposure despite imprecise exposure classification. Am J Ind Med. 1991;19:587–601
  18. Hoffman FO, Ruttenber J, Apostoaei AI, Carroll RJ, Greenland S. The Hanford Thyroid Disease Study: an alternative view of the findings. Health Phys. 2007;92:99–111
  19. Li Y, Guolo A, Hoffmann J, Carroll RJ. Shared uncertainty in measurement error problems, with application to the Nevada Test Site fallout data. Biometrics. 2007;63:1226–1236
  20. Lyon JL, Alder SC, Stone MB, Scholl A, Reading JC, Holubkov R, et al. Thyroid disease associated with exposure to the Nevada nuclear weapons test site radiation: a reevaluation based on corrected dosimetry and examination data. Epidemiology. 2006;17:604–614
  21. Mallick B, Hoffman FO, Carroll RJ. Semiparametric regression modeling with mixtures of Berkson and classical error, with application to fallout from the Nevada test site. Biometrics. 2002;58:13–20
  22. Schafer DW, Gilbert ES. Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose–response analyses. Radiat Res. 2006;166:303–312
  23. Schafer DW, Lubin JH, Ron E, Stovall M, Carroll RJ. Thyroid cancer following scalp irradiation: A reanalysis accounting for uncertainty in dosimetry. Biometrics. 2001;57:689–697
  24. Spiegelman D, Valanis B. Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists. Am J Pub Health. 1998;88:406–412
  25. Stefanski LA, Cook J. Simulation extrapolation: the measurement error jackknife. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:1247–1256
  26. Stürmer T, Thürigen D, Spiegelman D, Blettner M, Brenner H. The performance of methods for correcting measurement error in case-control studies. Epidemiology. 2002;13:507–516
  27. Van Roosbroeck S, Li R, Hoek G, Lebret E, Brunekreef B, Spiegelman D. Traffic-related outdoor air pollution and respiratory symptoms in children: the impact of adjustment for exposure measurement error. Epidemiology. 2008;19:409–416
  28. Armstrong BG. Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:651–656
  29. Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14:451–458
  30. Greenland S. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1662–1673
  31. Gustafson P, McCandless LC. Probabilistic approaches to better quantifying the results of epidemiologic studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:1520–1539
  32. Kopecky KJ, Davis S, Hamilton TE, Saporito MS, Onstad LE. Estimation of thyroid radiation doses for the Hanford thyroid disease study: results and implications for statistical power of the epidemiological analyses. Health Phys. 2004;87:15–32
  33. Stayner L, Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Stram DO, Deltour I, Gilbert SJ, et al. A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers. Radiat Res. 2007;168:757–763
  34. Stevens W, Thomas DC, Lyon JL, Till JE, Kerber RA, Simon SL, et al. Leukemia in Utah and radioactive fallout from the Nevada test site. A case-control study. JAMA. 1990;264:585–591
  35. French NHF, Goovaerts P, Kasischke ES. Uncertainty in estimating carbon emissions from boreal forest fires. J Geophys Res. 2004;109:D14S08
  36. Greenland S. Multiple-bias modeling for analysis of observational data. J R Stat Soc A. 2005;168:267–306
  37. Waller LA, Gotway CA. Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons; 2004;406–409
  38. Meliker JR, Slotnick MJ, AvRuskin GA, Schottenfeld D, Jacquez GM, Wilson ML, et al. Lifetime exposure to arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a population-based case-control study in Michigan. Cancer Cause Control. 2010;21:745–757
  39. Slotnick MJ, Meliker JR, Nriagu JO. Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA. Sci Total Environ. 2006;369:42–50
  40. Goovaerts P, AvRuskin G, Meliker J, Slotnick M, Jacquez G, Nriagu J. Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of arsenic in groundwater of southeast Michigan. Water Resources Res. 2005;41:W07013
  41. Meliker JR, AvRuskin GA, Slotnick MJ, Goovaerts P, Schottenfeld D, Jacquez GM, et al. Validity of spatial models of arsenic concentrations in private well water. Environ Res. 2008;106:42–50
  42. USGS. Arsenic in Groundwater of the United States. Data updated March 30, 2000. Available at: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/trace/arsenic/. Accessed September 20, 2005.
  43. Natural Resources Defense Council . Arsenic and Old Laws: A Scientific and Public Health Analysis of Arsenic Occurrence in Drinking Water, Its Health Effects, and EPA’s Outdated Arsenic Tap Water Standard. 2000. Available at: http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/arsenic/aolinx.aspAccessed September 20, 2005
  44. Kobrosly RW, Meliker JR, Nriagu JO. Automobile industry occupations and bladder cancer: a population-based case-control study in southeastern Michigan. USA. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:650–656
  45. Silverman DT, Devesa SS, Moore LE, Rothman N. Bladder cancer. In:  Schottenfeld D,  Fraumeni J editor. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2006;p. 1101–1127
  46. Rothman K. Induction and latent periods. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114:253–259
  47. Hofer E. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. Health Phys. 2008;95:277–290

PII: S1047-2797(10)00163-8

doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.012

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 20, Issue 10 , Pages 750-758 , October 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution