Incidence and Predictors of Hearing Aid Use and Ownership Among Older Adults With Hearing Loss

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.03.005Get rights and content

Purpose

The reasons are not clear as to why people who need hearing aids and possess them do not use them. We aimed to describe the incidence and predictors of hearing aid ownership and use among older adults.

Methods

We included 2,015 Blue Mountains Hearing Study participants aged ≥55 years who were examined between 1997 and 1999 and 2002 and 2004. Hearing levels were measured with pure-tone audiometry.

Results

The 5-year incidence of hearing aid use and ownership was 8.1% and 8.5%, respectively. Age was associated with incident hearing aid ownership and use, multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) per decade increase in age of 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–2.64) and of 1.66 (95% CI, 1.15–2.40), respectively. Any level of hearing loss (HL) at baseline predicted a 2.8-fold increased likelihood of using a hearing aid at follow-up. Hearing handicap was associated with 7% increased likelihood of incident aid use. Key reasons provided for not obtaining/using a hearing aid were: not recommended one (8.0%), its high cost (1.7%), and believing that they did not need one (9.0%).

Conclusions

Incident hearing aid ownership and usage was relatively low among hearing impaired adults. Age, question-defined hearing handicap, and measured HL were significant predictors of incident hearing aid use/ownership.

Introduction

Sensorineural age-related hearing loss (HL) is the most common form of hearing impairment (1), with reported prevalence between 30% and 46% of older population-based samples 2, 3. The strong age-related increase in HL prevalence (4) creates a significant burden not only for persons with this condition, but also for people who communicate with them (5). A diminished ability to hear and communicate is frustrating, and impacts on the affected individuals as well as other people in their environment (6). It is not therefore surprising that HL is associated with many adverse effects, including poor quality of life 7, 8, increased reliance on community or family support (9), negative well-being 7, 10, 11, depressive symptoms 12, 13, 14, and increased mortality risk (15).

There is an accumulating body of evidence to show that amplification devices such as hearing aids may improve the ability to communicate and thus, improve quality of life, prevent social isolation and hearing-related depression 11, 16, 17, 18, 19. Despite the known benefits of hearing aids, only a small fraction, between 10% and 30% of hearing impaired older adults actually use a hearing aid 7, 19, 20. Furthermore, a significant number of older adults who possess aids do not use them regularly (19). This proportion has not changed in recent years, despite innovations that have produced improvements in hearing aid technology (21). In the Blue Mountains Hearing Study (BMHS), of those with measured HL only 11% owned a hearing aid. Of persons who were current hearing aid owners, 24% reported never using their aids (22). These findings imply that the barriers to increasing the effectiveness and uptake of hearing aids encompass more than an inadequate device (23). These potential barriers include severity of HL, attitudes and personality characteristics, subjective perceptions of benefit, costs, cognitive and functional restrictions, and sociodemographic factors 21, 24.

Previous research that has estimated the prevalence of hearing aid ownership and actual use 7, 19, 20, has not comprehensively considered a full range of factors associated with the use of these devices (24). Second, there is a lack of prospective data on this association and much of the existing research is based on smaller, clinical-based samples of older adults, which may be less representative of the general population 24, 25. In the current study, we used a large, community-based sample of adults aged 55 years and older to address these gaps by establishing the (a) 5-year incidence of hearing aid use and ownership and (b) factors associated with incident hearing aid use and ownership. These data are potentially useful in developing intervention strategies that increase hearing aid penetration and benefit.

Section snippets

Study Population

The BMHS is a population-based survey of age-related HL conducted between 1997 and 2004 among participants of the Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES) cohort (26). During 1992 through 19944, 3,654 participants 49 years or older were examined (82.4% participation; BMES-1). Surviving baseline participants were invited to attend 5-year follow-up examinations (1997–1999, BMES-2), at which 2,334 (75.1% of survivors) and an additional 1,174 newly eligible residents were examined, namely those who had

Results

Table 1 shows the baseline (BMES-2) characteristics of participants (n = 1,371) stratified by the usage or ownership of a hearing aid at baseline. Hearing aid owners versus non-owners were more likely to be older, to self-report a hearing impairment, have a HL of more than 25 dB HL, and a hearing handicap (HHIE-S > 8). Compared with non-owners, participants who described using a hearing aid at baseline were more likely to be older, receiving pension payments, have HL, self-report a hearing

Discussion

Longitudinal data on hearing aid use and ownership from the general population are currently lacking. Such epidemiologic estimates and correlates over a long period are important to more effectively target older adults who may not be in contact with the health sector for their hearing problems (24). The current report demonstrates a relatively low incidence of hearing aid ownership and usage, with fewer than 1 in 10 older adults taking up ownership or using a hearing aid. Among key reasons

References (48)

  • D.S. Dalton et al.

    The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults

    Gerontologist

    (2003)
  • J. Schneider et al.

    Hearing loss impacts on the use of community and informal supports

    Age Ageing

    (2010)
  • C.D. Mulrow et al.

    Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1990)
  • S. Kochkin et al.

    Quantifying the obvious: the impact of hearing instruments on quality of life

    Hearing Review

    (2000)
  • W.J. Strawbridge et al.

    Negative consequences of hearing impairment in old age: a longitudinal analysis

    Gerontologist

    (2000)
  • B. Gopinath et al.

    Depressive symptoms among older hearing impaired adults: the Blue Mountains Study

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2009)
  • C. Carabellese et al.

    Sensory impairment and quality of life in a community elderly population

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1993)
  • I. Appollonio et al.

    Effects of sensory aids on the quality of life and mortality of elderly people: a multivariate analysis

    Age Ageing

    (1996)
  • W. Golabek et al.

    Self-reported benefits of hearing aids by the hearing impaired

    Br J Audiol

    (1988)
  • C.D. Mulrow et al.

    Sustained benefits of hearing aids

    J Speech Hear Res

    (1992)
  • M.M. Popelka et al.

    Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1998)
  • J.A. Ward et al.

    Hearing impairment and hearing aid use in women over 65 years of age. Cross-sectional study of women in a large urban community

    Med J Aust

    (1993)
  • H. Meister et al.

    The relationship between pre-fitting expectations and willingness to use hearing aids

    Int J Audiol

    (2008)
  • D. Hartley et al.

    Use of hearing aids and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (108)

    • Factors influencing utilisation of assistive devices by the elderly in China: a community-based cross-sectional study

      2022, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      The observation that the prevalence of ADs was highest among those with a low monthly income was somewhat surprising. As has been previously reported, cost is a major barrier to not using ADs,32 and more favourable economic conditions are important predictors of accessibility to health services.33 In this study, one plausible interpretation is that when physical function decreases, the elderly in the lower-income group may seek help from inexpensive aids instead of medical resources.

    • Hearing aid utilization in Ontario–a population based study

      2024, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The Blue Mountains Eye and Hearing Studies were supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant Nos. 974159, 991407, 211069, 262120). The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the HEARing CRC, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program.

    View full text