Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 207-212, March 2012

Do Medical Marijuana Laws Increase Marijuana Use? Replication Study and Extension

  • Sam Harper, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Sam Harper, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Room 34B, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada. Tel.: 514-398-2856; Fax: 514-398-4503.
  • ,
  • Erin C. Strumpf, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Department of Economics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Jay S. Kaufman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Received 12 October 2011; accepted 29 December 2011. published online 30 January 2012.

Purpose

To replicate a prior study that found greater adolescent marijuana use in states that have passed medical marijuana laws (MMLs), and extend this analysis by accounting for confounding by unmeasured state characteristics and measurement error.

Methods

We obtained state-level estimates of marijuana use from the 2002 through 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. We used 2-sample t-tests and random-effects regression to replicate previous results. We used difference-in-differences regression models to estimate the causal effect of MMLs on marijuana use, and simulations to account for measurement error.

Results

We replicated previously published results showing higher marijuana use in states with MMLs. Difference-in-differences estimates suggested that passing MMLs decreased past-month use among adolescents by 0.53 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03–1.02) and had no discernible effect on the perceived riskiness of monthly use. Models incorporating measurement error in the state estimates of marijuana use yielded little evidence that passing MMLs affects marijuana use.

Conclusions

Accounting for confounding by unmeasured state characteristics and measurement error had an important effect on estimates of the impact of MMLs on marijuana use. We find limited evidence of causal effects of MMLs on measures of reported marijuana use.

Key Words: Adolescents, Medical Marijuana Law, Medical Marijuana, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Quasi-Experiments

Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms: CI, confidence interval, MML, medical marijuana law, NSDUH, National Survey on Drug Use and Health

 

PII: S1047-2797(11)00372-3

doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.12.002

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 207-212, March 2012