Elsevier

Annals of Epidemiology

Volume 27, Issue 12, December 2017, Pages 771-776
Annals of Epidemiology

Original article
Can the introduction of a full-service supermarket in a food desert improve residents' economic status and health?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.10.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the impacts of a new supermarket in a low-income desert, on residents' economic status and health.

Methods

We surveyed a randomly selected cohort in two low-income Pittsburgh neighborhoods before and about 1 year following the opening of a supermarket. We used difference-in-difference approach to test changes across the two neighborhoods in residents' food security, United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infant and Children participation, employment, income, and self-reported health/chronic disease diagnoses.

Results

We observed declines in food insecurity (−11.8%, P < .01), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation (−12.2%, P < .01), and fewer new diagnoses of high cholesterol (−9.6%, P = .01) and arthritis (−7.4%, P = .02) in the neighborhood with the new supermarket relative to residents of the comparison neighborhood. We also found suggestive evidence that residents' incomes increased more ($1550, P = .09) and prevalence of diabetes increased less in the neighborhood with the supermarket than in the comparison neighborhood (−3.6%, P = .10).

Conclusions

Locating a new supermarket in a low-income neighborhood may improve residents' economic well-being and health. Policymakers should consider broad impacts of neighborhood investment that could translate into improved health for residents of underserved neighborhoods.

Section snippets

Background

Research examining associations between poverty and poor health has largely focused on individuals' economic status. Recent work identified links between neighborhood economics and health (e.g., mortality) [1], [2]. Neighborhood characteristics that have been tied to health include educational quality, access to social and economic services, and access to healthy foods [3]. Yet, the evidence is not fully consistent with respect to cardiometabolic health (e.g., obesity) [4], [5], [6], [7], and

Study design and participants

Pittsburgh Hill/Homewood Research on Eating, Shopping and Health (PHRESH) study used a quasi-experimental prepost design to investigate the effects of opening a HFFI (S.1926, H.R. 3525) supported FSS. We compared two neighborhoods, Hill District (intervention neighborhood) and Homewood (comparison neighborhood). The two neighborhoods were chosen to match in terms of (1) proportion of the neighborhood that is African-American (about 95 percent of the population in each categorized themselves as

Characteristics of study participants

Our study sample was predominantly non-Hispanic African–American/black (95.2%), female (75%), and middle-aged (mean age at baseline was 53 years; Table 1).

On average, residents were economically disadvantaged. At baseline, only one-third reported being employed full- or part-time, relative to not employed. Households had low incomes with a mean annual household per capita income of $13,608 and close to half (44.7%) were below the FPL. Similarly, about half reported receiving SNAP benefits;

Discussion

Using a quasi-experimental design with a randomly selected cohort in intervention and comparison neighborhoods, we found that the introduction of a FSS in a neighborhood that previously did not have FSS may have positively impacted resident economic status and health. Our findings suggest that residents living in the intervention neighborhood saw greater reduction in food insecurity and SNAP participation, and a slower growth in diagnosed high cholesterol and arthritis incidence, relative to

Acknowledgments

The authors express sincere appreciation and gratitude to La'Vette Wagner, field coordinator of the Pittsburgh Hill/Homewood Research on Eating, Shopping, and Health (PHRESH) study and the data collection staff. The authors thank the Hill House Association, Operation Better Block, and Homewood Children's Village. Without their participation, the study could not have happened.

Funding was provided by the National Cancer Institute (R01CA164137 “Impact of Greenspace Improvement on Physical Activity

References (38)

  • Expanding housing choices for HUD-assisted families

    (1996)
  • J. Ludwig et al.

    Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes–a randomized social experiment

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    Associations of housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods with subsequent mental disorders during adolescence

    JAMA

    (2014)
  • J. Ludwig et al.

    Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults

    Science

    (2012)
  • T. Dubowitz et al.

    Healthy food access for urban food desert residents: examination of the food environment, food purchasing practices, diet and BMI

    Public Health Nutr

    (2015)
  • PolicyLink, The Food Trust, and The Reinvestment Fund. A healthy food financing initiative: an innovative approach to...
  • J. Bell et al.

    Access to healthy food and why it matters: a review of the research

    (2013)
  • The economic impacts of supermarkets on their surrounding communities

    (2006)
  • R. Flournoy et al.

    Strategies and policy opportunities to improve access to healthy food

    (2005)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Supermarket Proximity and Risk of Hypertension, Diabetes, and CKD: A Retrospective Cohort Study

      2023, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      As neighborhood characteristics such as supermarket proximity are modifiable risk factors in disease development, initiatives to increase supermarket access have been proposed but have yielded mixed results. In some studies, enhanced supermarket access in urban environments increased awareness of healthy food options and consumption of fruits and vegetables by minority groups, reduced participation in SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, ie, government nutrition assistance), reduced levels of obesity and high cholesterol, provided a safe environment for positive social interaction and social support among shoppers, and was a potential source for neighborhood investment.51-55 Other studies reported more modest effects of increasing supermarket access alone, including concerns that despite providing better access and reduced prices, supermarket introduction did not increase healthy food and vegetable intake, did not alter BMI, and increased exposure to unhealthy items.54,56,57

    • Disparities in SNAP online grocery delivery and implementation: Lessons learned from California during the 2020-21 COVID pandemic

      2022, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      In comparison, no rural limited food access areas were fully serviced, 30.5% were partially deliverable, and 69.5% were not deliverable at all (Brandt et al., 2019). Overall, increasing access to online shopping in limited food access areas may mitigate the purported harms of living in such areas, which is typically associated with worse health outcomes (Richardson et al., 2017). In contrast, the results of this study suggests there was relationship between COVID case rates and the percentage of the CalFresh population covered by the SNAP OPP.

    • Modeling urban systems: Comparing the efficacy of simulated interventions on the urban food environment

      2022, Sustainable Cities and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Creating stores in underserved locations—increasing the number of grocery stores in a given region is one way to increase the number of people who have access to healthy food. This disruptor was implemented by creating new grocery store agents in various places within the case study regions to understand how increasing the number of stores and varying their location influences accessibility (Richardson et al., 2017; Rogus et al., 2018). While this is not an intervention that decision makers can implement directly, incentive structures such as tax breaks can be put in place to influence the number of stores that open in a given region.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text