Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 7, Issue 7, Supplement , Pages S54-S68, October 1997

Synthesis of findings and issues from community prevention trials*

  • Caroline Schooler, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Dr. Caroline Schooler, Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1000 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304.
    • From the Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304.
  • ,
  • John W. Farquhar, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304.
  • ,
  • Stephen P. Fortmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304.
  • ,
  • June A. Flora, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304.

Received 28 March 1997; accepted 20 May 1997.

Purpose: Lessons from three decades of community prevention trials are discussed to provide directions for the future of community health promotion efforts.

Methods: The rationale for and characteristics of community prevention trials for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction are presented. Published articles regarding the main effects and component studies of community prevention trials regarding CVD were reviewed.

Results: All early and most recent community prevention trials carried out in diverse populations demonstrated population-wide effects on CVD risk factors, particularly blood pressure levels and smoking prevalence. Moreover, subgroup component studies (e.g., schools, worksites, events) demonstrate the efficacy of many risk reduction strategies. These results support a dose-response relationship by evidence of stronger effects where adequate exposure to the intervention was achieved.

Conclusions: Although much remains untested in theory and practice, data indicate that community-based efforts to reduce the risk of CVD can influence behavior. Additional research is needed to increase understanding of the optimal mix and sequencing of components of these programs. In addition, this review indicates the importance of incorporating strategies to influence environmental change. Recommendations for the future include research regarding evaluation methods and the interaction of environmental and educational strategies, as well as dissemination research and concurrent international technology transfer of the vast number of lessons learned and the many widely accepted practice principles of community-based interventions.

Key words: Cardiovascular Disease, Prevention, Health Promotion, Risk Factors, Review

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

* This research was supported by Public Health Service grant HL21906 from the National Heart, Lung, and BLood Institute.

PII: S1047-2797(97)80008-7

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 7, Issue 7, Supplement , Pages S54-S68, October 1997