Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 9, Issue 5 , Pages 283-289, July 1999

Comparison of Self-Reported and Physician-Reported Antidepressant Medication Use

  • Michelle Cotterchio, MPH, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario Canada
  • ,
  • Nancy Kreiger, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario Canada
    • Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada. M.C. is a research student of the National Cancer Institute of Canada supported with funds provided by the Canadian Cancer Society.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Nancy Kreiger, Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2L7 Canada
  • ,
  • Gerarda Darlington, PhD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario Canada
    • Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada. M.C. is a research student of the National Cancer Institute of Canada supported with funds provided by the Canadian Cancer Society.
  • ,
  • Allan Steingart, MD, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada. M.C. is a research student of the National Cancer Institute of Canada supported with funds provided by the Canadian Cancer Society.

Received 7 May 1998; received in revised form 1 December 1998; accepted 1 December 1998.

Abstract 

PURPOSE: Self-reported medication histories obtained in pharmacoepidemiologic case-control studies are subject to non-differential misclassification and to recall bias. The accuracy of self-reported antidepressant medication use has never been evaluated, but it is important in light of the hypothesis that antidepressant medications may be associated with cancer risk.

METHODS: Within a case-control study of several cancer sites, we compared self-reported antidepressant medication use with antidepressant use recorded in physicians’ records. All female cases (n = 147) and controls (n = 119) who reported antidepressant medication use, and a 10% random sample (n = 114) of those who reported no antidepressant use, were asked to provide consent to contact, and the name(s) of their physician(s). These physicians completed a data abstraction form including information on antidepressant prescriptions recorded in patients’ medical records.

RESULTS: Substantial agreement was found between subject- and physician-reported antidepressant medication use (kappa = 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47–0.74]; agreement = 80%), and use of specific antidepressant medications (agreement ranged from 82 to 100%), while moderate agreement was observed for duration of use (weighted kappa = 0.56 (95% CI, 0.32–0.79)), and date of first use [weighted kappa = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.23–0.72)]. The level of agreement did not differ markedly between cases and controls, except for duration of use, where agreement was somewhat greater for cases.

CONCLUSIONS: The similar level of agreement among cases and controls suggests that differential misclassification (e.g., recall bias) is unlikely in the reporting of most aspects of antidepressant medication use by women. Furthermore, the overall accurate self-reporting of antidepressant use suggests that there should be minimal non-differential antidepressant exposure misclassification.

Keywords:  Antidepressants, Self-report, Medical records, Misclassification

Abbreviations:  ECS = Enhanced Cancer Surveillance, CMD = Canadian Medical Directory, NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1047-2797(98)00072-6

Annals of Epidemiology
Volume 9, Issue 5 , Pages 283-289, July 1999