Elsevier

Annals of Epidemiology

Volume 28, Issue 8, August 2018, Pages 543-548
Annals of Epidemiology

Original article
Associations between history of chronic lung disease and non–small cell lung carcinoma in Maryland: variations by sex and race

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.04.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Chronic inflammatory lung diseases (COPD and asthma) are associated with NSCLC risk.

  • Increase in disease duration is associated with NSCLC risk in women, not in men.

  • In never smokers, women, but not men, with asthma are at increased risk for NSCLC.

  • Chronic inflammatory lung disease is associated with NSCLC risk in black and white.

Abstract

Purpose

Lung cancer is a multifactorial malignancy for which some risk factors, such as chronic lung diseases, their interactions with smoking, and how they differ by race and sex, are not fully understood. We investigated the associations between chronic inflammatory lung disease and non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and how sex and race may affect such associations.

Methods

Using logistic regression, we analyzed 1660 lung cancer cases and 1959 population controls and estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Chronic lung disease was significantly associated with higher odds of having NSCLC in never (AOR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.19–3.34), former (AOR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.29–2.20), and current smokers (AOR = 2.40; 95% CI = 1.62–3.57), after adjustment for relevant covariates. For each 5-year increment in chronic lung disease duration, the risk of lung cancer increased only among females (AOR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.02–1.13). Females, but not males, with asthma were at risk for NSCLC (AOR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.40–3.10).

Conclusions

This study provides support for chronic lung inflammation as a potential contributing factor to lung cancer risk and possible sex difference in the inflammatory events underlying disease mechanisms.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and in the United States [1], [2], [3]. There are two predominant types: small cell lung carcinoma and non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); the latter is the most common type (85%–90% of all cases) [4]. Differences in incidence and mortality exist by race and sex. In the United States, age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer are significantly higher in black than in white men, but comparable between black and white women [3], [5], [6]. Cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for developing lung cancer [7]; however, approximately 25% of all lung cancer cases are not attributable to smoking [8], [9], and 10%–15% of these cancer deaths occur in never smokers [10]. Other established risk factors for lung cancer, including environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), radon gas, occupational exposures to carcinogens, air pollution, and genetic susceptibility [11], [12], failed to explain all of its incidence, particularly in never smokers [9], [10].

Lung cancer in never smokers occurs disproportionately in women [13], [14], has better response to targeted therapy [15], and its incidence is higher in non-whites [16]. These unique characteristics suggest that it may be a different disease from smoking-related lung cancer [9], [15]. One potential risk factor is chronic inflammation, which can lead to DNA damage, mutations, and ultimately cell growth and proliferation [17], especially among never smokers [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Both prospective and retrospective studies have found a positive association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer risk in never smokers [18], [19], [23], [24], whereas others found positive associations with other lung diseases such as asthma, tuberculosis, and pneumonia [18]. Many of these studies did not explore sex- and/or race-specific associations, and some studies had small sample size or did not carefully examine the potential interplay of chronic lung diseases and tobacco exposures.

To address these gaps in knowledge, we analyzed data from the Maryland lung cancer study. We assessed the associations between NSCLC risk and history of chronic lung disease (defined as history of chronic bronchitis, COPD, emphysema, or asthma) and its duration (i.e., time since the participants' diagnoses), and how sex and race affect such associations, in the presence or absence of smoking.

Section snippets

Study design

The parent study is an on-going case-control study designed principally to investigate potential genetic mechanisms underlying variations in NSCLC by sex and race in Maryland [25], [26], [27], [28]. The institutional review boards of the University of Maryland, the National Cancer Institute, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sinai Hospital, MedStar Research Institute, and Georgetown University, as well as the Research Ethics Committee of Bon Secours Health System, approved the

Results

Between 1998 and 2015, 10,380 lung cancer cases were screened, and 2415 (23.3%) met the eligibility criteria and completed screening. Approximately 68% agreed to participate, leading to 1660 enrolled NSCLC cases. Of eligible controls, 90% agreed to participate, resulting in 1959 population-based controls. Descriptive analysis of the data set revealed small numbers for history of asbestosis (n = 117) and tuberculosis (n = 106) and a large missing number (n = 2133) for pneumonia. Therefore,

Discussion

We found significantly higher risk of NSCLC in never smokers who had a history of chronic lung disease, asthma, or COPD as compared with those without such history; and for each 5-year increment in chronic lung disease duration, the odds of having NSCLC was significantly higher among females (7%) but lower among males (6%). Women with history of either asthma or COPD were more than men at risk for NSCLC.

Our findings are consistent with those previously reported, although the chronic lung

Conclusion

This study provides support for an inflammatory process as a potential contributing factor to NSCLC risk, regardless of smoking status, and for possible sex difference in the inflammatory events underlying disease mechanisms. Additional investigations are needed to confirm the observed relationships and elucidate the role of the inflammatory processes in the development of NSCLC. Should the results confirm the postulated mechanism, one might consider anti-inflammatory drugs as potential

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Dean Mann and Ray Jones for their management of the parent study. The authors sincerely thank Mr. Leonidas Leondarides for assistance with the database. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute contract N02BC71006.

References (42)

  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2012

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2012)
  • SEER stat fact sheets: lung and bronchus cancer. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (seer) web. site

  • M. Parkin et al.

    Lung cancer epidemiology and etiology

  • C.J. Etzel et al.

    Development and validation of a lung cancer risk prediction model for African-Americans

    Cancer Prev Res (Phila)

    (2008)
  • P.N. Lee et al.

    Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer

    BMC Cancer

    (2012)
  • The Health consequences of smoking – 50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general

    (2014)
  • S. Sun et al.

    Lung cancer in never smokers – a different disease

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2007)
  • J.M. Samet et al.

    Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2009)
  • T. Yano et al.

    Non-small cell lung cancer in never smokers as a representative “non-smoking-associated lung cancer”: epidemiology and clinical features

    Int J Clin Oncol

    (2011)
  • M.J. Thun et al.

    Lung cancer occurrence in never-smokers: an analysis of 13 cohorts and 22 cancer registry studies

    PLoS Med

    (2008)
  • E.A. Engels

    Inflammation in the development of lung cancer: epidemiological evidence

    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther

    (2008)
  • All authors have participated in conception and design or analysis and interpretation of the data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and approval of the final version.

    View full text